<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Jeremy Whiting <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jpwhiting@kde.org">jpwhiting@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
Kanagram repo looks good to me.<br><br>Jeremy<br><br>P.S. Did we decide anything about the non keduvocdocument libs in libkdeedu? do we want each lib in it's own repo? or one kde-edulibs repo?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Nicolas Alvarez <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nicolas.alvarez@gmail.com" target="_blank">nicolas.alvarez@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
<div><div></div><div>Ian Monroe wrote:<br>
> I've only done a basic look over on each repo (looked at branches,<br>
> made sure each only had one parentless commit), plan on doing more<br>
> tonight. But really it helps to know the history of the code to know<br>
> if everything looks right. Also if folks could do build tests that<br>
> would be helpful.<br>
><br>
> The repos are dated from the 13th or so.<br>
><br>
> You can see them under scratch/ianmonroe at <a href="http://quickweb.kde.org" target="_blank">http://quickweb.kde.org</a><br>
><br>
> To clone them all, launch `ruby`, copy the following code and end on a<br>
> newline + ctrl-d.<br>
><br>
> [<br>
> "blinken",<br>
> "cantor",<br>
> "kalgebra",<br>
> "kalzium",<br>
> "kanagram",<br>
> "kbruch",<br>
> "kgeography",<br>
> "khangman",<br>
> "kig",<br>
> "kiten",<br>
> "klettres",<br>
> "kmplot",<br>
> "kstars",<br>
> "ktouch",<br>
> "kturtle",<br>
> "kwordquiz",<br>
> "libkdeedu",<br>
> "marble",<br>
> "parley",<br>
> "rocs",<br>
> "step"<br>
> ].each { |project|<br>
> `git clone git://<a href="http://anongit.kde.org/scratch/ianmonroe/#%7Bproject%7D%60" target="_blank">anongit.kde.org/scratch/ianmonroe/#{project}`</a><br>
> }<br>
<br>
</div></div>Here's a suggestion: If you review a repository, even if you find nothing<br>
wrong, say so in this thread. Then, if you want to look at a repository,<br>
pick one that got the least reviews by others.<br>
<br>
That way we avoid having 3 people carefully looking at one repo and some<br>
other repo being ignored.<br>
<br></blockquote></div></blockquote><div>Rocs is fine.</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
--<br>
<font color="#888888">Nicolas<br>
</font><div><div></div><div><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Kde-scm-interest mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Kde-scm-interest@kde.org" target="_blank">Kde-scm-interest@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-scm-interest</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
kde-edu mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kde-edu@mail.kde.org">kde-edu@mail.kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Wagner de Melo Reck<br><br>