Quality team web site

[Mikal]

Yes please tell me what to import to techbase and what to let go...
That's my problem. I'm not feeling I'm the boss for this site, so I would
like to get commands.

On 11/29/07, George Goldberg <grundleborg at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> On Nov 29, 2007 6:42 PM, Mikal <mikal.villa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Now I've removed the link from techbase.kde.org/Contribute and linked it
> to
> > http://www.kde.org/getinvolved/ instead.
> > I will try to port more information into techbase. But I suggest we move
> all
> > important information to techbase, then redirect quality.kde.org to
> > techbase.. Any comments?
> >
> >
>
> sounds good to me. Let me know if there's anything I can do to help out.
>
> >
> > On 11/29/07, George Goldberg < grundleborg at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 29, 2007 5:45 PM, Mikal <mikal.villa at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I have moved some information over to the techbase, but I really
> don't
> > know
> > > > what other I should do..
> > > > Should I move the whole site to the techbase?
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Cool, someone else beat me to it :). I didn't actually look very hard,
> > > just noticed that recent KDE release announcements pointed to
> > > quality.kde.org as one option for getting involved, and followed the
> > > link.
> > >
> > > Also, techbase.kde.org/Contribute still links to quality.kde.org so
> > > perhaps it should link to one of the page you have done on the
> > > techbase?
> > >
> > > >
> > > > On 11/29/07, Adriaan de Groot <groot at kde.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thursday 29 November 2007 07:10:39 George Goldberg wrote:
> > > > > > Have just been looking at the quality team web site, and
> realised
> > that
> > > > > > it is hideously out of date! I thought of offering to contribute
> to
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, it is, because the "quality team" concept as originally
> started
> > has
> > > > > withered and died.
> > > > >
> > > > > > improving it, but actually I think it would make more sense to
> > create
> > > > > > a 'quality team' page on techbase seeing as a lot of the
> information
> > > > > > is already there, and then point quality.kde.org there. Would
> this
> > be
> > > > > > a welcome contribution or are there other ideas out there for
> it?
> > > > >
> > > > > I believe Mikal was working on it -- please check on techbase if
> there
> > > > isn't
> > > > > already that kind of stuff there.
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > kde-quality mailing list
> > > > > kde-quality at kde.org
> > > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Mikal Villa
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > kde-quality mailing list
> > > > kde-quality at kde.org
> > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > > kde-quality mailing list
> > > kde-quality at kde.org
> > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Mikal Villa
> > _______________________________________________
> > kde-quality mailing list
> > kde-quality at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> kde-quality mailing list
> kde-quality at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-quality
>



-- 
Regards,
Mikal Villa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-quality/attachments/20071129/632097d3/attachment.html