<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Chris Jones <span dir="ltr"><christopher.rob.jones@cern.ch></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d"><br>
On 22 Jan 2009, at 8:03PM, Big O wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> On Jan 21, 2009, at 7:00 AM, Chris Jones wrote:<br>
><br>
>> Hi,<br>
>><br>
>>> wouldn't it be better if we just put aliases in<br>
>>> /Applications/Macports/KDE4, much like QT's apps?<br>
>>> so we'd have macports app in their /opt/local/ directory, and a<br>
>>> quick<br>
>>> link in /Applications<br>
>>><br>
>>> anybody agrees?<br>
>><br>
>> +1 here<br>
> We could do that but why "/Applications/Macports/KDE4" as opposed to<br>
> "/<br>
> Applications/Macports"?<br>
> It would look neater but beyond that's what's the advantage?<br>
<br>
</div>Well, it is just a matter of opinion, but for me it is just nice to<br>
organize things like this. Qt4 has /Applications/Macports/Qt,<br>
similarly my various python installs have their own dub-dirs.<br>
Personally I would like to have all the KDE4 apps in their own sub-<br>
dir, rather than have them cluttering up the root /Applications/<br>
Macports directory... Just my 2 pence worth.<br>
<br>
BTW, is it possible for the KDE applications to have their proper<br>
icons ? At the moment they all get some default icon here. Not exactly<br>
high priority...</blockquote><div><br>i agree for both statements! Even better the /Application/Macports/KDE4 should contain only symlinks to the /opt/local/bin executables, so the macport installed program remain always in a single directory!<br>
that and the icons would be great! <br></div></div><br>