hi,<br>first of all ,, welcome kashyap :)<br><br>QT as LGPL , IMHO , i think it would be kinda counter - productive in long run ..i mean now there is really no legal pressure on companies like apple to open source their changes to code. though to tell a truth i need to study more about LGPL to be sure of it's clauses .<br>
<br>though i have kind of mixed bag of feeling towards this issue :) because for sure this will increase acceptance of qt in other domains .<br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Regards:<br>
Shashank Singh<br>Associate - Software | OLAI<br>Geodesic Limited | <<a href="http://www.geodesic.com">http://www.geodesic.com</a>> <br>Tel: +91 22 2831 2872 <br><br>Blog:<a href="http://techfreaks4u.com/blog">http://techfreaks4u.com/blog</a><br>
Marble contributor : <a href="http://edu.kde.org/marble/">http://edu.kde.org/marble/</a><br>KDE-in Volunteer : <a href="http://www.kde.in/">http://www.kde.in/</a><br>