<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'DejaVu Sans'; font-size:9pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Wednesday 21 January 2009 20:26:26 Gilles Caulier wrote:<br>
> Next digiKam and kipi-plugins beta tarballs are ready to test before to<br>
> post on SF.net they are here :<br>
><br>
> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0-rc1.tar.bz2<h<br>
>ttp://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0-beta6.tar.bz2><br>
> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-0.2.0<br>
> -rc1.tar.bz2<http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-0.10.0-<br>
>beta6.tar.bz2><br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Both build fine on Ubuntu Jaunty and I am already preparing packages for Intrepid and Jaunty.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>One thing that I have noticed: icons are installed in three locations: <br>
- /usr/share/icons/hicolor, <br>
- /usr/share/icons/oxygen <br>
- /usr/share/apps/digikam/icons/hicolor<br>
I cannot notice a clear pattern what is installed where. AFAIK, particularly the application icons (digikam.png and showfoto.png) should go in /usr/share/hicolor in order to be available on all desktop environments (GNOME, XFCE...). I suspect we should not ship anything in oxygen too.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>See attached file for the list of all installed icons.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>I have noticed some interesting warnings by debian packager in kipi-plugins and will see if we can really get rid of these linked libraries for final release:<br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libICE.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libkabc.so.4 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_calendar.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libGLU.so.1 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libXdmcp.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libXau.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgmodule-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_ipodexport.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libSM.so.6 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_imageviewer.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libkde3support.so.4 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_picasawebexport.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_flickrexport.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_ipodexport.so debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_slideshow.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libgthread-2.0.so.0 could be avoided if "debian/kipi-plugins/usr/lib/kde4/kipiplugin_ipodexport.so" were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). <br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>> Translations stats is here :<br>
><br>
> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-l10n-0.10.0-rc1.html<br>
><http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-l10n-0.10.0-beta6.ht<br>
>ml> http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/kipi-plugins-l10n-0.2.0<br>
> -rc1.html<http://digikam3rdparty.free.fr/0.10.x-releases/digikam-l10n-0.10.<br>
>0-beta6.html><br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>I have noticed that Slovenian (sl) is not on the list of digikam translations, even though that I see there is digikam.po in SVN:<br>
http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/l10n-kde4/sl/messages/extragear-graphics/<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Is there something missing to include this translation?<br>
Disclaimer: I have no clue how i18n/l10n works in KDE. ;-)<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Regards,<br>
Luka</p></body></html>