<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/7/23, Angelo Naselli <<a href="mailto:anaselli@linux.it">anaselli@linux.it</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> Currently FindImage use a local cache in disk to store another type of image<br>> checksum. this way is too slow.<br>From AUTHORS file maintainers are:<br>Find images : Jesper K. Pedersen and Richard Groult
<br>Any comments?<br>> Also this plugin is not fully integrated in digiKam Album gui interface.<br>> There are few B.K.O reports about this problem.<br>Well you can disable it into digikam :p<br>><br>> > KameraKlient : obsolete (for digiKam). it will be never ported by digiKam
<br>> > > team.<br>> > Well I'm not happy to hear that, I can understand digikam is not<br>> > interested<br>> > in that, but maybe kipi-plugins is, so plugins that are used by other<br>> > hosts
<br>> > should be supported anyway.<br>><br>><br>> In this case, others kipi hosts developpers must do this port (:=))).<br>I'd love to! But we are suppose to provide plugins, they're suppose to use
<br>(or not them).<br>But as always we've a lack of maintainers.<br><br>> kameraklient is a un-maintened plugin Code source come from digiKam<br>> 0.6release... It's a fork in fact...<br>I don't know what to say, should we remove them?
</blockquote><div><br>no, it's not a problem. This plugin is disable in digiKam (:=)))...<br><br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
digikam users could not see any difference, but i don't know anything about other<br>host application users (note *users* not developers).</blockquote><div><br>If others host apps. use it, no problem...</div></div><br>
Gilles<br>