<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/5/8, Angelo Naselli <<a href="mailto:anaselli@linux.it">anaselli@linux.it</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Alle marted́ 8 maggio 2007, Angelo Naselli ha scritto:<br>> Alle marted́ 8 maggio 2007, Achim Bohnet ha scritto:<br>> > On Tuesday, 8. May 2007, Angelo Naselli wrote:<br>> > > Alle marted́ 8 maggio 2007, Achim Bohnet ha scritto:
<br>> > > > On Sunday, 6. May 2007, Angelo Naselli wrote:<br>> > > > > SVN commit 661885 by anaselli:<br>> > > > ><br>> > > > > Release 0.1.4<br>> > > > > - fix libtools version-info
<br>> > > ><br>> > > > Hi, Angelo,<br>> > > ><br>> > > > looks like it get fixed in the wrong way ;)<br>> > > ><br>> > > > When I build 0.1.4 pkgs and install them, digikam io slaves only give errors like
<br>> > > ><br>> > > > digikam: ERROR: : couldn't create slave : Unable to create io-slave:<br>> > > > klauncher said: Error loading 'kio_digikamthumbnail'.<br>> > > >
<br>> > > > Reinstalling 0.1.1 and digikam works again.<br>> > > ><br>> > > > Anyone else tried to run an app build with 0.1.1<br>> > > > to run with 0.1.4?<br>> > > hmmm are this comment the reason?
<br>> > > (Depreciate: used internaly by digiKam core.)<br>> > ><br>> > > Gilles you changed a lot of methods from protected to private,<br>> > > I guess if that was the cause<br>> >
<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > mhmm, looking into .xsession-error shows:<br>> ><br>> > usr/lib/kde3/kio_digikamthumbnail.so: undefined symbol: KExiv2Iface::KExiv2::getImageOrientation()<br>> ><br>
> > if only this method is missing. I would suggest to<br>> > just keep this method instead (make as depreacated)<br>> > and delay delay API backward break to a future release ;)<br>> Anyway it's a mess, since libkexiv2 is not used by digikam only.
<br>><br>> Suggestion?<br>Ok so it seems we missed the compatibility between 0.1.1 and 0.1.2<br>but we realized it after (e.g. > 0.1.3) that means all the releases<br>we've done till now are "broken". I suggest to change version info
<br>to 2:1:0 anyway.<br>WDYT?<br><br><br>Angelo<br></blockquote></div><br>You want mean something like libkeviv2 0.1.4 using a version info like 2:1:0 ?<br><br>There is no relation between the package release id and the version info of library ?
<br><br>Gilles<br>