<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/4/9, Rex Dieter <<a href="mailto:rdieter@math.unl.edu">rdieter@math.unl.edu</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Angelo Naselli wrote:<br><br>> Hi please test the new tarball you can find here:<br>> <a href="http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/">http://www.linux.it/~anaselli/kipi-plugins/</a><br>><br>> I haven't test it against exiv2
0.14 yet, so any<br>> feedbacks here are welcome.<br><br>Good news: builds, good work.<br><br>Bad news: Now all we need are new/compatible releases of kipi-plugins and<br>digikam (latest releases both fail to build against
exiv2-0.14). :(</blockquote><div><br>digiKam 0.9.2 implementation from svn compile fine against Exiv2 0.14. kipi-plugins do not depand directly from Exiv2 and use only libkexiv2.<br><br>digiKam 0.9.2 is planed during June.
<br><br>Gilles<br><br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">-- Rex<br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>Kde-imaging mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Kde-imaging@kde.org">Kde-imaging@kde.org</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-imaging">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-imaging</a><br></blockquote>
</div><br>