[Kde-imaging] Discussing the future of kipi and kipi-plugins

Joern Ahrens joern.ahrens at kdemail.net
Mon Jan 30 12:54:33 CET 2006


On Monday 30 January 2006 12:36, Sebastian Röder wrote:
> > Alle 15:41, domenica 29 gennaio 2006, Tom Albers ha scritto:
> > > > I'm full agree with you Joern. You already know my viewpoint about
> > > > kipi and others projects witch uses plugins (outside digikam of
> > > > course).
> > >
> > > Ok, lets pull the plug then. We need to think about how to move the
> > > kipi's back to digiKam. I suppose we can do that best at digikam-devel.
> > >
> > > toma
> >
> > I don't like this solution, but if no one tells that he's not agree...
> > I will say my last comment then, as a user i probably don't know
> > kipi/kipi-plugins are plugins of my preferred image viewer (let's say
> > gwenview), so i cannot understand what you're going to decide. What i see
> > is i won't have my features any more... that's bad IMO (even if
> > digikam-devel could solve the problem for developers). As a packager it
> > means who care about digikam package will have to manage some confilicts.
> > As a developer, which I'm in life not in this project, it is very sad to
> > see how a great idea and job is failing....
>
> Yes it's very sad to see a good idea die - but the project was kind of dead
> cause of the missing participation of the NON-digikam projects (maybe you
> should contact your gwenview devels and "complain"). In the whole time of

No Sebastian, we really don't  need that

... Jörn



More information about the Kde-imaging mailing list