I'd like to know if there is any chance of a game proposal being accepted in GSoC, or if it would not be considered. I'm, sort of, a beginner here, so I don't know the lay of the KDE land :)<br><br>Cheers.<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Stefan Majewsky <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stefan.majewsky@googlemail.com">stefan.majewsky@googlemail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Miha Čančula <<a href="mailto:miha@noughmad.eu">miha@noughmad.eu</a>> wrote:<br>
> I'd like to hear from Stefan about this, could the Tagaro library use a SoC<br>
> project? Does it still have missing features<br>
<br>
</div>Most of it is unfinished sketches in my work branches (TagaroSvg,<br>
TagaroInput, TagaroInterface). This stuff either needs to be finished<br>
in the 4.7 timeframe, or it heavily depends on my personal ideas and<br>
roadmap which is difficult to communicate to any persons != me.<br>
<br>
Perhaps Tagaro's GGZ integration could be done via GSoC, but then you<br>
need to ask Josef Spillner about it.<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> or should we start converting<br>
> games to it? Both of these would be great as a summer job, I think.<br>
<br>
</div>Porting to Tagaro is currently discouraged because we will need to<br>
figure out how to release it after the Git move. If we figure that out<br>
before GSoC, it might be interesting, but it might be difficult for<br>
the student to adapt himself to the moving target that is Tagaro.<br>
<br>
Greetings<br>
Stefan<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
kde-games-devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kde-games-devel@kde.org">kde-games-devel@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-games-devel" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-games-devel</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>