<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Sans Serif'; font-size:10pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 13:12:14 Luciano Montanaro wrote:<br>
> 2009/2/24 Eugene Trounev <eugene.trounev@gmail.com>:<br>
> > Well. alright then. let it stay the way it is. I'm firmly against<br>
> > imposing on users yet another *great* feature they will never use (mostly<br>
> > cos they will never know about it).<br>
><br>
> "As it is" is definitely not what I want...<br>
> Is my proposal so bad? I think it's a middle ground we could agree on.<br>
Sure. I'm all for it, it's just I don't want yet another "chooser" we already have a front chooser, and back chooser. Now add an interface chooser and it's one too many. I would like to drop the back chooser and only have a deck, and interface chooser instead.<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p></body></html>