<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Sans Serif'; font-size:10pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Tuesday 24 of February 2009 09:47:33 Matthew Woehlke wrote:<br>
> I think you omitted the part I dislike most; you're removing the ability<br>
> to have a /background/ independent of the cards. (I notice Luciano makes<br>
> the same objection ;-).)<br>
Well, it doesn't work now anyways, so no losses there.<br>
> Also, I still think it would be nice if the deck (which can include its<br>
> own back) specifies the "style" of back and would let you pick other<br>
> backs of the same style (i.e. size and shape). Else if you just want a<br>
> different back, you have to copy an entire deck.<br>
And right now if you want to have different tiles with the same pictures in mahjongg you have to copy them over too. I don't see anyone doing that.<br>
Specifying shape's a bit of an overkill if you ask me. Besides how would you describe a *style*?</p></body></html>