<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Liberation Sans'; font-size:11pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 11:26:03 +1100, Dima Panov wrote:<br>
> On Saturday 25 April 2009 07:20:45 miwi@freebsd.org wrote:<br>
> > Synopsis: fix build of net/kdenetwork4 on -current<br>
> ><br>
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback<br>
> > State-Changed-By: miwi<br>
> > State-Changed-When: Fri Apr 24 20:20:19 UTC 2009<br>
> > State-Changed-Why:<br>
> > Howdy,<br>
> ><br>
> > could you please test following patch:<br>
> ><br>
> > http://miwi.homeunix.com/patches/kdenetwork_kpp.diff<br>
> ><br>
> > Thanks<br>
><br>
> BTW, why we need keeping kppp, if pppd (and if_ppp) was removed from the<br>
> base system?<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>We still have ppp(8), not sure if it can be used with kppp. If not then we have to drop kppp and/or ask for ppp support in kppp.<br>
Btw, is there any interested in ppp/kppp?<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p>Max<br>
<p style="-qt-paragraph-type:empty; margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px; margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px; -qt-user-state:0;"><br></p></body></html>