<table><tr><td style="">zzag added a comment.
</td><a style="text-decoration: none; padding: 4px 8px; margin: 0 8px 8px; float: right; color: #464C5C; font-weight: bold; border-radius: 3px; background-color: #F7F7F9; background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#fff,#f1f0f1); display: inline-block; border: 1px solid rgba(71,87,120,.2);" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D28882">View Revision</a></tr></table><br /><div><div><blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid #8C98B8;
color: #6B748C;
font-style: italic;
margin: 4px 0 12px 0;
padding: 8px 12px;
background-color: #F8F9FC;">
<div style="font-style: normal;
padding-bottom: 4px;">In <a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D28882#658780" style="background-color: #e7e7e7;
border-color: #e7e7e7;
border-radius: 3px;
padding: 0 4px;
font-weight: bold;
color: black;text-decoration: none;">D28882#658780</a>, <a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/p/apol/" style="
border-color: #f1f7ff;
color: #19558d;
background-color: #f1f7ff;
border: 1px solid transparent;
border-radius: 3px;
font-weight: bold;
padding: 0 4px;">@apol</a> wrote:</div>
<div style="margin: 0;
padding: 0;
border: 0;
color: rgb(107, 116, 140);"><blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid #a7b5bf; color: #464c5c; font-style: italic; margin: 4px 0 12px 0; padding: 4px 12px; background-color: #f8f9fc;"><p>In future, it might be faster to put up just the interface xml for review first.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/p/davidedmundson/" style="
border-color: #f1f7ff;
color: #19558d;
background-color: #f1f7ff;
border: 1px solid transparent;
border-radius: 3px;
font-weight: bold;
padding: 0 4px;">@davidedmundson</a> <a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/p/zzag/" style="
border-color: #f1f7ff;
color: #19558d;
background-color: #f1f7ff;
border: 1px solid transparent;
border-radius: 3px;
font-weight: bold;
padding: 0 4px;">@zzag</a> I don't really see how it would have made a difference, you only decided to review it 7 to 10 days after I first submitted it. 🤷</p>
<blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid #a7b5bf; color: #464c5c; font-style: italic; margin: 4px 0 12px 0; padding: 4px 12px; background-color: #f8f9fc;"><p>What about using existing wl_output objects? The add_source event can be simplified quite a lot (even maybe dropped). For windows, we could use string handles.</p></blockquote>
<p>So your proposal would be to pass a random resource id or string and see what the compositor spits back?</p></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Well, it's not that different from passsing uints like this patch proposes. In either case we have to have some protection against garbage input values and possibly inert resources. wl_outputs are not some random objects and practically every GUI application keeps track of them.</p>
<blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid #a7b5bf; color: #464c5c; font-style: italic; margin: 4px 0 12px 0; padding: 4px 12px; background-color: #f8f9fc;"><p>My intention was to keep the protocol auto-contained to some extent so every client doesn't need to track windows and screens to be able to request a stream.</p></blockquote>
</div></div><br /><div><strong>REPOSITORY</strong><div><div>R127 KWayland</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>REVISION DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D28882">https://phabricator.kde.org/D28882</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: </strong>apol, KWin, jgrulich, davidedmundson, zzag<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>meven, davidedmundson, romangg, zzag, kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, michaelh, ngraham, bruns<br /></div>