<table><tr><td style="">mpyne accepted this revision.<br />mpyne added a comment.
</td><a style="text-decoration: none; padding: 4px 8px; margin: 0 8px 8px; float: right; color: #464C5C; font-weight: bold; border-radius: 3px; background-color: #F7F7F9; background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#fff,#f1f0f1); display: inline-block; border: 1px solid rgba(71,87,120,.2);" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D4439" rel="noreferrer">View Revision</a></tr></table><br /><div><div><p>The diff as proposed is just fine. I've been bitten by <tt style="background: #ebebeb; font-size: 13px;">qDeleteAll</tt> at proc exit before when called on objects that have complex destructors, but that's not the case here.</p>
<p>It would probably be a good idea to try to streamline the code structurally so that we don't have to hold pointers. But given the difficulty that it would entail, I think it would deserve either a separate Differential review, or to "upgrade" this review to focus on the structural change for its own sake, instead of just working on the memleak at process exit.</p></div></div><br /><div><strong>REPOSITORY</strong><div><div>R244 KCoreAddons</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>BRANCH</strong><div><div>master</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>REVISION DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D4439" rel="noreferrer">https://phabricator.kde.org/D4439</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>EMAIL PREFERENCES</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/" rel="noreferrer">https://phabricator.kde.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: </strong>dfaure, aacid, mpyne<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>markg, Frameworks<br /></div>