<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 6:57 AM, Marko Käning <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mk-lists@email.de" target="_blank">mk-lists@email.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On 08 Jul 2014, at 01:15 , Aleix Pol <<a href="mailto:aleixpol@kde.org">aleixpol@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Well, you'd get an application for managing processes, it's cool, but then you need to provide a backend for it.<br>
</div>yep<br>
<div class=""><br>
> IMHO, you have projects much more interesting to port than ksysguard.<br>
</div>I guess, it was just something I picked from the kf5-qt5 dependency list.<br>
<br>
<br>
I guess it would be good to figure out which frameworks/applications would be best to include next in the OSX/CI systems runs!<br>
<br>
The current status of it can be seen here: <a href="https://trac.macports.org/wiki/KDEProblems/KDEMacPortsCI/Status#KF5softwarebeyondthebasicframeworks" target="_blank">https://trac.macports.org/wiki/KDEProblems/KDEMacPortsCI/Status#KF5softwarebeyondthebasicframeworks</a></blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Just a thought, you can consider porting applications in KDE Edu [1], this way you can start thinking what you want the end deliverables to look like while the rest of the community keep porting the big applications.<br>
<br>Aleix<br></div></div><br>[1] <a href="http://community.kde.org/KDEEdu/RouteToKF5">http://community.kde.org/KDEEdu/RouteToKF5</a><br></div></div>