<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Àlex Fiestas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:afiestas@kde.org" target="_blank">afiestas@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class="">On Friday 28 March 2014 11:30:25 Alex Merry wrote:<br>
> In principle, I agree. In practice, a lot of our frameworks have a<br>
> runtime dependency of some sort on it.[0]<br>
><br>
> Alex<br>
><br>
><br>
> [0]: <a href="http://lxr.kde.org/search?v=kf5-qt5&_filestring=&_string=kded5" target="_blank">http://lxr.kde.org/search?v=kf5-qt5&_filestring=&_string=kded5</a><br>
<br>
</div>I can't talk for other frameworks but in the case of Solid it is a mistake<br>
since it makes code that is cross-platform not cross-platform anymore.<br>
<br>
During the next week I will either remove that or make it platform specific<br>
(kde integration).<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well yes, actually we should (re-)consider whether frameworks that depend on QtDBus in general if they're cross-platform or not. [1]</div><div><br></div><div>
Aleix</div><div><br></div><div>[1] <a href="http://www.proli.net/2014/03/19/kde-sdk-next-how-will-we-develop-in-a-year/">http://www.proli.net/2014/03/19/kde-sdk-next-how-will-we-develop-in-a-year/</a></div><div></div></div>
</div></div>