Critical Denial of Service bugs in Discover

Ben Cooksley bcooksley at kde.org
Tue Mar 8 08:16:22 GMT 2022


On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 1:16 PM Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org> wrote:

>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2022 at 8:36 AM Ben Cooksley <bcooksley at kde.org> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2022 at 12:49 AM Aleix Pol <aleixpol at kde.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I'd say wireshark is too low level for what the problem is here. We are
>>> talking about having too many HTTP requests for specific URLs.
>>>
>>
>> Correct, I guess the difference in our approaches comes from a "before
>> release" to a "monitor after release" angle to things.
>> I'd like to see increased scrutiny during the development process as well
>> to make sure that we release code that operates properly from Day 1.
>>
>
> A way to do this could be using commit hooks that do not allow to reach
> certain services. (which we discussed in private chat).
> We could also analyse at cmake time the knsrc files we install, but this
> has a very limited and specific scope.
>

I've now applied two checks as part of the hooks which will hopefully catch
anything new being introduced.
We still need to ensure that anything pre-existing is sorted out of course.


>
>
>> I can think two main measures:
>>> - Trigger an alarm (an e-mail notification?) if there's a specific
>>> UserAgent that has a specific portion of the queries we have in a specific
>>> day in the services we care about.
>>> - Offer plots to see how queries by UserAgent evolve over the last
>>> couple of months (or couple of years).
>>>
>>
>> At the moment our ability to analyse our logs is somewhat limited by our
>> Privacy Policy - https://kde.org/privacypolicy/
>> Currently we don't have any provision for long term storage of
>> this information even on an aggregated basis - so we would need to update
>> this first.
>>
>
> Hopefully the NDA should help here and it doesn't seem all that far away.
> I know Neofytos and Ade have been working on it lately.
>

The privacy policy will still need to be updated, but that can form part of
the puzzle yes.


>
> The second issue there is that we are transitioning users to contact a CDN
>> based endpoint (which is substantially more scalable).
>> This does mean we lose visibility on data such as User Agents and the
>> URLs being impacted though as we only get aggregated data unless we ask for
>> raw logs - which makes implementing something like what you've described
>> much harder.
>>
>
> That does seem like a stopper. Still, it seems like it's not that big of a
> problem when there is a CDN, so we better worry about the other cases.
>

We should still be reasonable to the CDN of course, but it makes it much
more managable yes.


>
> Aleix
>

Cheers,
Ben
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-frameworks-devel/attachments/20220308/5b4c4c8a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list