<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 02.07.20 um 23:39 schrieb Ralf
      Habacker:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:53c5596c-490f-5826-6202-552e701934fb@freenet.de">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 24.06.20 um 10:29 schrieb Ralf
        Habacker:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:9c18b581-f70f-a773-7048-ed2618ad61fa@freenet.de">
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <code><span class="pln"></span></code>
        <pre class="lang-cpp prettyprint prettyprinted" style=""><code><span class="com">//don't use me any more</span><span class="pln">
DEPRECATED </span></code><code><span class="pln"><span class="gmail-im"></span>bool isDataValidForDate(std::time_t date) const;
</span></code></pre>
      </blockquote>
      This example may not use usefull. The DEPRECATED macro should only
      be used for functions, which are outdated<code><span class="pln"></span></code>
      and should </blockquote>
    not<br>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:53c5596c-490f-5826-6202-552e701934fb@freenet.de">be used
      anymore.<code><span class="pln"> </span></code></blockquote>
    <p><code><span class="pln">Regards</span></code><code><span
          class="pln"><br>
          Ralf
        </span></code><code><span class="pln"></span></code></p>
    <blockquote type="cite"
      cite="mid:53c5596c-490f-5826-6202-552e701934fb@freenet.de">
      <blockquote type="cite"
        cite="mid:9c18b581-f70f-a773-7048-ed2618ad61fa@freenet.de">
        <pre class="lang-cpp prettyprint prettyprinted" style=""><code><span class="pun"></span></code></pre>
        <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAM9DqsJ9Qc3pN9UmzJk9t2v3MrC1xdiUrUzfme7POiNzkm5CiQ@mail.gmail.com">
          <div dir="ltr"><br>
            <span class="gmail-im"></span>
            <div><span class="gmail-im"></span></div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 14 Jun 2020 at
              01:35, Ralf Habacker <<a
                href="mailto:ralf.habacker@freenet.de"
                moz-do-not-send="true">ralf.habacker@freenet.de</a>>
              wrote:<br>
            </div>
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
              0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
              rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Am 13.06.20 um 06:52
              schrieb Prasun Kumar:<br>
              > Hi mentors,<br>
              > I have tested the SQLite database to implement<br>
              > AccountNumberCheck::findbank() and it worked
              successfully. Now I'm<br>
              > ready to change the present code.<br>
              > So how should I make these commits? Should I replace
              the current code<br>
              > by commenting them out<br>
              No  need for that as changes are recorded in git log<br>
              <br>
              or should I remove them altogether?<br>
              <br>
              yes, see above<br>
              <br>
              > Also, there are many methods which deal solely with
              textfile reading<br>
              > such as dataValidStartDate(), dataValidEndDate(),
              isDataValidForDate(),<br>
              > find_closest_datafile to name a few.<br>
              <br>
              >  bool isDataValidForDate(std::time_t date) const;<br>
              ><br>
               > /** Returns true if a bankdata file valid for the
              given date is<br>
               > * available, otherwise false.<br>
               >  *<br>
               >  * Whether this file has already been loaded has to
              be queried<br>
               >  * separately through isDataValidForDate().<br>
               >  *<br>
               >  * This function was introduced in ktoblzcheck-1.15.<br>
                 */<br>
              This and the other methods are part of the public api and
              should not be<br>
              removed as clients may depends on them.<br>
              <br>
              > To make the commits small, I would be making a commit
              for each method<br>
              > change.<br>
              yes, looks good.<br>
              <br>
              Regards<br>
              <br>
              Ralf<br>
              <br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </blockquote>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>