<table><tr><td style="">wreissenberger added a comment.
</td><a style="text-decoration: none; padding: 4px 8px; margin: 0 8px 8px; float: right; color: #464C5C; font-weight: bold; border-radius: 3px; background-color: #F7F7F9; background-image: linear-gradient(to bottom,#fff,#f1f0f1); display: inline-block; border: 1px solid rgba(71,87,120,.2);" href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D20029">View Revision</a></tr></table><br /><div><div><blockquote style="border-left: 3px solid #a7b5bf; color: #464c5c; font-style: italic; margin: 4px 0 12px 0; padding: 4px 12px; background-color: #f8f9fc;"><p>Related? <a href="https://indilib.org/forum/ekos/4995-ekos-scheduler-eats-frames-from-the-sequence.html#37550" class="remarkup-link" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">https://indilib.org/forum/ekos/4995-ekos-scheduler-eats-frames-from-the-sequence.html#37550</a></p></blockquote>

<p>With the latest information posted - YES. It's exactly the situation with a capture job of 18*L+3*R+3*G+3*B.</p></div></div><br /><div><strong>REPOSITORY</strong><div><div>R321 KStars</div></div></div><br /><div><strong>REVISION DETAIL</strong><div><a href="https://phabricator.kde.org/D20029">https://phabricator.kde.org/D20029</a></div></div><br /><div><strong>To: </strong>wreissenberger, mutlaqja, TallFurryMan<br /><strong>Cc: </strong>kde-edu, narvaez, apol<br /></div>