<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:23 PM, <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:v_2e@ukr.net">v_2e@ukr.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:58:28 +0100<br>
Aleix Pol <<a href="mailto:aleixpol@kde.org">aleixpol@kde.org</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>
><br>
> a reason would be I use a non-unix system and there's no easy way to install<br>
> KDE.<br>
><br>
> but of course here the solution is not to remove the dependency.<br>
<br>
</div> My question is for what exact purposes does Step use kdelibs. Maybe,<br>
it won't be too hard to make a bit changed variant of Step with no<br>
kdelibs dependency.<br>
Personally, I prefer to use Qt-only applications and it would be nice<br>
to have a Qt-only version of Step too. Just like Marble! :)<br>
I believe it would be just excellent to have both KDE-dependant and<br>
Qt-only variants of Step. Do you think I'm wrong?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"> Vladimir.<br>
-----<br>
<<a href="mailto:v_2e@ukr.net">v_2e@ukr.net</a>><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
kde-edu mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kde-edu@mail.kde.org">kde-edu@mail.kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>I don't think KDE Libs is such a big dependency and I don't think it makes sense to have all applications with 2 GUI implementations. It's against KDE philosophy.<br><br>Anyway, whay kind of system do you use where using kdelibs is such a problem?<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>Aleix<br><br>