<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/02/2013 10:09 PM, Randall Wood
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:513278B5.4000807@woodbriceno.net" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/28/2013 09:54 PM, Randall Wood
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1533535.Viv4orMWWi@koala" type="cite">
<meta name="qrichtext" content="1">
<style type="text/css">
p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style>
<p style=" margin-top:0px; margin-bottom:0px; margin-left:0px;
margin-right:0px; -qt-block-indent:0; text-indent:0px;
-qt-user-state:0;">I'm just writing to let everyone know I've
begun work on this. I'll be merging those three docs into one,
updating a bit, removing outdated references, and filling out
the bits that weren't clear to me until I learned them
elsewhere - especially now that we're mostly off SVN and
mostly on GIT. I'll have a draft for everyone to review later
in March.<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
As I progress, I'll be sending some questions to the team. </blockquote>
<br>
Thanks Luigi for your response to the previous question. Here's my
second question:<br>
<br>
The Primer mentions Application Handbooks and User Guides. I'm sure
I'm familiar with the Application Handbooks, which I think are the
docs that appear in the KDE Helpcenter. But I don't know what the
User Guides are. Do they still exist? The primer is impressing
upon the author the need to differentiate between diverse "packages"
of information. I think we should be rather differentiating between
man pages, Application Guides (F1), and text for the User Base. <br>
<br>
Am I right? Are there other sources of info out there we should be
mentioning?<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>