<!DOCTYPE html>
<html data-lt-installed="true">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body style="padding-bottom: 1px;">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 18/05/2025 16:41, Albert Vaca
Cintora wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAAQViEu9CgjtEJmB-Wvu+XqyniHTxvk38wB1yC969Yt2dq5HsQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">
<div>
<div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sun, 18 May 2025, 08:59
Justin Zobel, <<a href="mailto:justin@1707.io"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">justin@1707.io</a>>
wrote:</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div style="padding-bottom:1px">
<p>If the contributor cannot tell you the license(s) of
the code that was used to generate the code, then it's
literally gambling that this code wasn't taken from
another project by Gemini and used without their
permission or used in a way that violates the license
and opens up the KDE e.V. to litigation.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">I'm no lawyer but I would expect that training
AI will fall under fair use of copyrighted code. If that's not
the case already, it will probably be soon. The benefits of AI
to society are too large to autoimpose such a roadblock.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Albert</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>From my understanding (what others have told me), AI generally
does not produce good quality code though. So how is that a
benefit to society?</p>
</body>
<lt-container></lt-container>
</html>