<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
<blockquote cite="mid:200809121835.51443.aseigo@kde.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Friday 12 September 2008, Adrien BUSTANY wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Aaron J. Seigo a écrit :
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Friday 12 September 2008, Adrien BUSTANY wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Mandriva's (KRunner module, people tagging app, nepouk resource
explorer, konqueror extension...) all live in the playground for the
curious.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">speaking of which ... what are your plans for these? i'm particularly
interested in the runner myself (surprise!)
oh, and to keep this moving to completion: will you be doing the svn mv's
necessary to get the AnnotationPlugins somewhere i can use them in the
file dialog?
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">My plans are to continue to work on Nepomuk, as I really like the
technology... You can already test the runner, which works quite well
(you need the resource inspector too, screencast here :
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://people.mandriva.com/~abustany/demoResourceInspector3.ogg">http://people.mandriva.com/~abustany/demoResourceInspector3.ogg</a> or
s/ogg/avi if it doesn't work). I'd be glad if they could be tested, and
even moved to a more "official" part of KDE
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
that's what i was asking for =) if you feel the runner is ready for "prime
time" please move it into kdereview/plasma/runners/, announce on plasma-
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:devel@kde.org">devel@kde.org</a> and we'll get it reviewed.
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Do you think It would be better to svn mv or rather copy the files to
the dialog dir ? I'd rather keep a version in the playground, although
that implies keeping both versions sync'ed...
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
it makes no sense to keep two version in svn. mv what needs to be moved.
</pre>
</blockquote>
But then what happens for people who want to compile things in the
playground which use AnnotationPlugins ? Forgive me if I miss your
point, I just got out of bed :)<br>
<br>
Just some detail about the infrastructure of the annotation plugins :<br>
The "final user" (ie the developper using the plugins) uses a factory
classes, which will return plugins. Plugins all share a common
interface, but they don't install any header, you cannot instantiate
them directly. So you can't just move the File AnnotationPlugin to the
dialog tree, you need the whole code (and even if you could, the
resource inspector needs it).<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>