Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

[Harald Sitter]

On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Marco Martin <notmart at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Saturday 16 June 2012, Shaun Reich wrote:
>>
>> and the freezes would have to be *very* well communicated, because
>> even now we run into issues with people not realizing that we're in
>> string freeze or feature freeze.
>
> a part of the plan (kindof a consequency in the long term of the thing
> described here) is that it would mean aiming to a state where there are nover
> freezes (or well, master is always frozen, depends how you look at ;)
>
> master should always be in a releasable state, while the feature branches are
> merged in an integration one before is well tested.

How would one acquire testing on the integration branch?

HS