KDE SC 4.8.4 important problems

Vishesh Handa me at vhanda.in
Wed Jun 13 13:13:10 BST 2012


On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Sebastian Trüg <sebastian at trueg.de> wrote:

> I am totally lost. What is the problem with that commit?


AFAIK, the problem is that changes were made in both Soprano and KDElibs
for 4.9, but for 4.8.4, they are using this "changed" kdelibs with the old
soprano.


>
>
> On 06/12/2012 07:40 PM, José Manuel Santamaría Lema wrote:
>
>>
>>  Therefore, I tend to think the kdelibs commit mentioned in that bug
>>> report
>>> (**3d66d429cb48781881af3e735f2a80**af2114ab25) shouldn't have been done
>>> for
>>> 4.8.4. A confirmation from a Nepomuk developer would be highly
>>> appreciated.
>>>
>>
>> Just in case it isn't obvious enough, actually I meant this one shouldn't
>> have
>> been done for 4.8.4:
>> http://quickgit.kde.org/index.**php?p=kdelibs.git&a=commit&h=**
>> a43824a200ed76cef48a90bd3aee85**47698b7c91<http://quickgit.kde.org/index.php?p=kdelibs.git&a=commit&h=a43824a200ed76cef48a90bd3aee8547698b7c91>
>> which is the kdelibs one. I just pasted the wrong hash.
>>
>


-- 
Vishesh Handa
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20120613/72dee5d6/attachment.htm>


More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list