Keeping binary compatibility

[David Jarvie]

On Fri, October 1, 2010 2:32 pm, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  Therefore I propose the following:
> - private libraries do not (obviously ...?) install their .h files and do
> use
> NAMELINK_SKIP option in install (see e.g.
> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/khotkeys/libkhotkeysprivate/CMakeLists.txt?r1=862343&r2=895764)

Could you please explain why using NAMELINK_SKIP is better for private
libraries? What difference does it make whether links to the shared
library file are created?

-- 
David Jarvie.
KDE developer.
KAlarm author - http://www.astrojar.org.uk/kalarm