RFC: KToolBox

[Thiago Macieira]

Matt Broadstone wrote:
>As for the QPL stuff, can someone speak to that? Is it enough to throw
>a GPL license on it as opposed to the LGPL I threw on at the last
>minute.. I'm not really interested in  personal ownership of the code
>as much as I am getting it out there and useable and I am somewhat
>unfamiliar with what is possible under the GPL (I read it a little bit
>earlier but couldn't get a clear picture of what happens in this
>case).

If you copied the code from Qt, then it has to be GPL (not LGPL) and 
cannot be in kdelibs. Pretty much everyone agrees that QPL is dead, so 
let's not disturb it.

If you wrote the code, then you choose.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060904/2f83e9f4/attachment.sig>