The Technical Working Group's mission statement

[Christian Ehrlicher]

R.F. Pels schrieb:
> On Tuesday 14 March 2006 17.40, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> 
>> I'll repeat: the simple fact that cmake is the only alternative here,
>> short of going back to autotools, means that cmake is the choice.
>>
>> If it's a matter of decisions, then let's decide: cmake or autotools?
> 
> No kdevelop support for cmake, then, no cmake.
> 
Do you really think that
a) scons/bksys has kdevelop support?
b) it's too hard to implement - cmake is supporting msvc6 dsp and the
newer vcproj - projects and you really think there is no way to get it
working with kdevelop4?

Christian

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 252 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20060314/bed3c2e6/attachment.sig>