[RFC] Future of "messages" targets

[Thiago Macieira]

Nicolas Goutte wrote:
>And how do you check that there was a "mv" declared as function.
>
>Sure, defines are run before any outside executable or cript. But here
> we have no guarantee that the function was defined and that is the
> problem.

Why would you want to depend on a function you didn't declare and aren't 
sure to be there? If you want it, simply declare it.

I understand the other way around: you may want a certain command to be 
the command itself, not a function or alias.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

5. Swa he géanhwearf tó timbran, and hwonne he cóm, lá! Unix cwæð "Hello, 
World". Ǽfre ǽghwilc wæs glæd and seo woruld wæs fréo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050915/5304a867/attachment.sig>