SVN timing again

[Thiago Macieira]

Stephan Kulow wrote:
>So my question is: is there demand from kde-core-devel
>to wait more for Ossi to finish that feature or do you
>prefer to skip that and go to subversion right away.

Are we going with Subversion server 1.1 or 1.2? Since 1.2 has just been 
released, I have to wonder.

They list the xdelta compression as an improvement on several tasks, such 
as annotating. I think it might be useful to have.

So, that begs the question: has 1.2 been tested?

>Ossi is talking about two further weeks and having seen
>the how long his original week of delay was - nah, let's
>say we're talking two weeks here. What do you think?
>Wait or move?

I'd say go.

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira (DOT) info
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

4. And æfter se scieppend ingelogode, he wrát "cenn", ac eala! se 
rihtendgesamnung andswarode "cenn: ne wát hú cennan 'eall'. Ástynt."
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20050409/3f38e4f7/attachment.sig>