<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"></head><body><div>I would favour extend and improve KDE infrastructure.</div><div><br></div><div>Rick</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div style="font-size:100%">Sent from my Dragon 32</div></div> <br>Scott Petrovic <scottpetrovic@gmail.com> wrote:<br><div dir="ltr">I think Laszlo's suggestion with OSQA looks like a pretty good solution. I personally think a slightly better open source one is Lamp CMS <a href="http://support.lampcms.com/">http://support.lampcms.com/</a><div><br></div><div>I would personally prefer using Lamp CMS only because it integrates directly with other popular platforms like Google+ and Facebook. This is less friction for people to post questions and answers without having to sign up for yet another account. Not sure if social media integration is considered a 'dependency' though.</div><div><br></div><div>Scott</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Laszlo Papp <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:lpapp@kde.org" target="_blank">lpapp@kde.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I would personally much prefer integrating this into the KDE<br>
infrastructure rather than KDE going to Stack Exchange:<br>
<a href="http://www.osqa.net/" target="_blank">http://www.osqa.net/</a><br>
<br>
StackExchange is a commercial entity without open source accessbility<br>
to the implementation. Also, you need to comply with what<br>
StackExchange likes in the end of the day.<br>
<div><div class="h5"><br>
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 4:09 PM, Boudewijn Rempt <<a href="mailto:boud@valdyas.org">boud@valdyas.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> This is a question that came up on the #krita channel today. Our forums are<br>
> awesome, but not the best place for question and answer type of exchanges.<br>
> We even see questions appear on yahoo answers!<br>
><br>
> One proposal was to create a <a href="http://krita.stackexchange.com" target="_blank">krita.stackexchange.com</a>, like<br>
> <a href="http://blender.stackexchange.com/" target="_blank">http://blender.stackexchange.com/</a>. However, this is infra that's outside of<br>
> KDE. I don't know of anything equivalent, though!<br>
><br>
> So, what I wanted to get input on is: would creating a<br>
> <a href="http://krita.stackexchange.com" target="_blank">krita.stackexchange.com</a> be against the manifesto? And if so, is there any<br>
> equivalent (in terms of user-friendliness, googleability and<br>
> recognizability) that we can use withing KDE's infra structure?<br>
><br>
> For all clarity; this isn't a wiki, and it isn't a forum. It works in a very<br>
> different way.<br>
><br>
> Boudewijn<br>
><br>
> (Willing to experiment so fewer people wonder where their layers have gone.<br>
> <a href="https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20150224214426AAbFtKj" target="_blank">https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20150224214426AAbFtKj</a>)<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
</div></div>> kde-community mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:kde-community@kde.org">kde-community@kde.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community</a><br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Krita mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kimageshop@kde.org">kimageshop@kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div> </body>