BSD 3 Clause?

[Adriaan de Groot]

On Wednesday, 21 December 2022 10:12:03 CET Ingo Klöcker wrote:
> So, unless you must use BSD-3-Clause, please stick to BSD-2-Clause.

This, twice.

Keep in mind, also, that SPDX lists a half-dozen BSD-3-Clause variants. Do not 
use them at all. If you must use a BSD-3-Clause (because upstream, or 
whatever), use only this one https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-3-Clause.html .

Prefer https://spdx.org/licenses/BSD-2-Clause.html in all cases where a simple 
permissive license with no patent language is desired.

[ade]
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20221224/66b1173a/attachment.sig>