<html>
<body>
<div style="font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, Sans-Serif;">
<table bgcolor="#f9f3c9" width="100%" cellpadding="8" style="border: 1px #c9c399 solid;">
<tr>
<td>
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
<a href="https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/">https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/</a>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<br />
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<p style="margin-top: 0;">On February 21st, 2014, 7:47 p.m. UTC, <b>Luigi Toscano</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">The files have been moved to kdoctools, should I open a new review against the kdoctools component or can I get a shipit here? :)</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 22nd, 2014, 5:41 p.m. UTC, <b>Alex Merry</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">I thought I'd already made this reply, but let's try again... (maybe I did it on another RR?)
I would rather this was combined with https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115879/ as a single commit/review in kdoctools.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 22nd, 2014, 5:44 p.m. UTC, <b>Alex Merry</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Ah, turns out I had the reply typed out in a separate browser tab. Oops.</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 22nd, 2014, 5:48 p.m. UTC, <b>Luigi Toscano</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Even more, I recompiled and split the two RR in 3 commits, in few logical steps. The result is the combination of 115879 and this RR. Does it make sense?</pre>
</blockquote>
<p>On February 22nd, 2014, 6:02 p.m. UTC, <b>Alex Merry</b> wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="margin-left: 1em; border-left: 2px solid #d0d0d0; padding-left: 10px;">
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Yep; if the commits are coherent and each one builds sensibly, that's good. You can put all three in one RR if you like, though (assuming they're all in kdoctools, and you're not counting the kde4support things).</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<pre style="white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Superceeded by https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115956/</pre>
<br />
<p>- Luigi</p>
<br />
<p>On February 18th, 2014, 10:52 p.m. UTC, Luigi Toscano wrote:</p>
<table bgcolor="#fefadf" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="8" style="background-image: url('https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/static/rb/images/review_request_box_top_bg.ab6f3b1072c9.png'); background-position: left top; background-repeat: repeat-x; border: 1px black solid;">
<tr>
<td>
<div>Review request for Build System, Documentation and KDE Frameworks.</div>
<div>By Luigi Toscano.</div>
<p style="color: grey;"><i>Updated Feb. 18, 2014, 10:52 p.m.</i></p>
<div style="margin-top: 1.5em;">
<b style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt;">Repository: </b>
extra-cmake-modules
</div>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Description </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">FindDocBookXML.cmake was originally part of kdelibs/kdoctools, but not installed. The version currently in ECM is, as the old one, is quite tight to the old behavior, it hardcodes the DocBookXML version currently used.
- the rename reflect the fact that it's used for DocBookXML4; a future DocBookXML5 could be added if needed;
- the structure allows a generic usage ("find DocBookXML version 4.x"), not tied to the usage in KDocTools. KDocTools will be changed to call it with the correct version (the version number is a "property" of KDocTools, not used outside it, but hidden inside meinproc5 and libKF5XsltKde.a).
Next changes:
- use DocBookXML4 (so DocBookXML4_* instead of DOCBOOKXML_* legacy variables) in frameworks
- move the definition of legacy DOCBOOKXML_* in kde4support
</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Testing </h1>
<table width="100%" bgcolor="#ffffff" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="10" style="border: 1px solid #b8b5a0">
<tr>
<td>
<pre style="margin: 0; padding: 0; white-space: pre-wrap; white-space: -moz-pre-wrap; white-space: -pre-wrap; white-space: -o-pre-wrap; word-wrap: break-word;">Compiles (some changes are needed in KDocTools, I will add them to another review).</pre>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
<h1 style="color: #575012; font-size: 10pt; margin-top: 1.5em;">Diffs</b> </h1>
<ul style="margin-left: 3em; padding-left: 0;">
<li>find-modules/FindDocBookXML.cmake <span style="color: grey">(b6d623e)</span></li>
<li>find-modules/FindDocBookXML4.cmake <span style="color: grey">(PRE-CREATION)</span></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/115876/diff/" style="margin-left: 3em;">View Diff</a></p>
</td>
</tr>
</table>
</div>
</body>
</html>