Old style headers

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Sunday 15 June 2008, Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> On 15.06.08 16:56:33, Allen Winter wrote:
> > On Sunday 15 June 2008 16:15:38 David Johnson wrote:
> > > p.s. I did not realize that the old style lowercase headers were a
> > > political issue. I apologize for bringing up this topic. Shall I revert
> > > the few changes I have made?
> >
> > Don't revert.
> >
> > This isn't a political issue... well it is sorta.  Some people don't
> > like using the forwarding headers were they aren't required
> > because that makes compiling slower.
> >
> > But is an issue of having to take the time to fix something
> > that shouldn't need fixing.
> >
> > I wonder if their is a simple "if(FreeBSD)"  hack we can put
> > high up in the buildsystem to alleviate this problem??
>
> Well, the following woud work as long as nobody uses
>
> #include <QtCore/qobject.h>
>
> or similar. In our FindQt4.cmake the include-dir needs to get the order:
>
> <QtCore-includedir>:<QtGui-includedir>:...:<general-Qt-includedir>
>
> which would result in:
>
> /usr/local/include/QtCore:/usr/local/include/QtGui:...:/usr/local/include
>
> for David.
>
> Cc'ing buildsystem to ask wether that (re-ordering the include paths so
> that the general Qt4-includedir is after those for the individual
> modules)might be feasible.

So the question is whether the Qt-module include dirs can be can be put before 
the general include dir ?

What was the original problem ?

Alex