<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>The old Qyoto bindings are old - that is, obsolete and not supported even on theory. As far as any comparison (speed, memory, stability) is concerned, I personally am not familiar.<br></span></div><div><br></div> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div dir="ltr"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <hr size="1"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Cvetoslav Ludmiloff <ludmiloff@gmail.com><br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> kde-bindings@kde.org <br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Wednesday, February 1, 2012 10:23 PM<br> <b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [Kde-bindings] Qyoto : assemblygen.assemblies vs old
qyoto<br> </font> </div> <br>
<div id="yiv440556405">Hi all,<div>What are advantages of assemblygen.assemblies over old qyoto bindings ?</div><div>Does assemblygen perform more faster than old bindings?</div><div><br></div><div>Cvetoslav Ludmiloff</div><div>http://archstable.blogspot.com/</div>
</div><br>_______________________________________________<br>Kde-bindings mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Kde-bindings@kde.org" href="mailto:Kde-bindings@kde.org">Kde-bindings@kde.org</a><br><a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings</a><br><br><br> </div> </div> </div></body></html>