PyKF5 bindings generator improvements out for review.

[Shaheed Haque]

Hi Steve,

I've reviewed what got merged from PR2 and PR3, and reworked PR4 into what
I hope is a much more manageable form. The results are in PR9:

https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-modules/pull/9

As the comments say, I recommend reviewing the changes commit-by-commit,
and providing comments directly via github. When we are happy/ready, I'll
do the merge to KDE. I'll then redo the other PRs in turn, and bring them
back for review: in other words, for now, please only consider this one
pull request PR9.


On 4 February 2017 at 18:01, Shaheed Haque <srhaque at theiet.org> wrote:

> Hi Steve,
>
> Thanks for taking a look. I'll take another look at the PR4: I think I can
> split a few bits out in a more granular fashion and that should make it
> easier for you.
>
> That said, I would prefer to take the PRs in the order I posted them
> because otherwise it is hard for me to track what is and is not "done",
> especially as you sometimes end up changing what actually gets committed to
> KDE/master; that effectively creates yet another fork for me to have to
> reconcile. Ideally, I'd like us to use the PR process and let me do the
> commit to KDE when we are happy: the whole point of having all the branches
> and PRs split out the way they are is to make this tractable and to allow
> me to incorporate your comments in a systematic manner. As we deal with
> each PR, I can rebase and rewrite the subsequent PRs.
>
> I hope that sounds OK.
>
> Shaheed
>
> On 4 February 2017 at 12:09, Stephen Kelly <steveire at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Stephen Kelly wrote:
>>
>> > Simple, short and noiseless commits are easy to review, so please see if
>> > you can follow suit there.
>>
>> In particular, I tried to review the commit "Rule database structure
>> changes", but it seems to contain lots of unrelated things such as
>> outputting 'discarded' instead of 'suppressed', and lots more. That is all
>> noise and makes the commit hard to review.
>>
>> Please reduce that commit to the change in rules_SipTest.py plus whatever
>> minimum change is needed to the python code to support that. The rest of
>> the
>> changes can either be follow-ups or can appear before the API change
>> commit.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Steve.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-bindings/attachments/20170205/be88f2c5/attachment.html>