<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>Hi Aleix,</p>
<p>I don't know whether you are still looking for feedback. I want to report that I successfully updated my Android app [1] to have 64-bit support. I used kdeorg/android-arm-sdk and kdeorg/android-aarch64-sdk Docker containers to build the application and fastlane to upload the APKs.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great work!</p>
<p>Casper</p>
<p>[1] https://gitlab.com/caspermeijn/onvifviewer</p>
<p id="reply-intro">Aleix Pol schreef op 2019-07-26 23:04:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">Hi,<br />I built quickly another android image that produces aarch64:<br /><a href="https://cloud.docker.com/u/apol/repository/docker/apol/asdk5.13" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://cloud.docker.com/u/apol/repository/docker/apol/asdk5.13</a><br /><br />I would appreciate it if someone could give it a test.<br /><br />There's a couple of changes needed in ECM to get this upstream.<br /><br />Aleix<br /><br />On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 12:25 PM Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen<br /><<a href="mailto:admin@leinir.dk" rel="noreferrer">admin@leinir.dk</a>> wrote:
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><br />On Friday, 26 July 2019 10:56:48 BST Aleix Pol wrote:
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 10:51 AM Dan Leinir Turthra Jensen<br /><br /><<a href="mailto:admin@leinir.dk" rel="noreferrer">admin@leinir.dk</a>> wrote:
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">Hey everybody :)<br /><br /> With the many warning email being sent out from the Play store about<br /><br />requiring 64bit APKs for updates in a few days[1], i was wondering if this<br />is something that anybody's had time/energy to look into for the android<br />build docker?<br /><br />[1]<br /><a href="https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2019/01/get-your-apps-ready-for" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2019/01/get-your-apps-ready-for</a><br />-64-bit.html</blockquote>
Hi,<br />Yes, we should look into this but I haven't had the time.<br /><br />I'm wondering if it would make most sense to have another Dockerfile for<br />64bits:<br /><a href="https://cgit.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-tooling.git/tree/system-images/android/sdk" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://cgit.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-tooling.git/tree/system-images/android/sdk</a><br />/Dockerfile<br /><br />Then we'd have separate images building the same apks side-by-side<br />which is what Google Play seems to want right now.</blockquote>
<br /> That does seem like it would probably be the most straightforward way to do<br />this, rather than try and create those dual-mode apks i can't remember the<br />name of which contain both 32 and 64 bit binaries... and yeah, also seems like<br />it's what they actually want from us :)<br /><br />--<br />..dan / leinir..<br /><a href="http://leinir.dk/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://leinir.dk/</a><br /><br /><br /></blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br /></p>
</body></html>