<p>
----- Melding fra k1pfeifle@gmx.net ---------<br />
Dato: Sat, 21 Jul 2007 14:22:53 +0200<br />><br />
> Jo-Erlend Schinstad wrote:<br />
>> I do, in fact, remember Lindows. Why do you think that is? :)<br />
>> Litrix wouldn't be as informative as Lintrix, imho.<br />
><br />
> Lintrix doesn't sound very similar to Citr*x. But Litrix does.<br />
><br /><br /><br />Why do we have to choose a name that draws attention from
other "brands", why not choose something that stands on it's on
feet?</p><p>I like the concept behind VLSC, but the problem (as already
described) for me is that it isn't very easy to pronounce. (I like the
logo/artwork too :P) ScreenCable is maybe better, but still I hope for ...
something "better".</p><p>HYDE too could work for me (Kurt - I didn't
understand the arguments pro/con, could you elaborate please?), but I still have
hope we find something "better".</p><p>We need to keep in mind, as
Gian Filippo wrote, that NoMachine don't want us to use 'NX' in the name, which
I think we should respect.<br /><br />Please send more ideas, I'll try to come
up with some too during the weekend...</p><p><br />(As a sidenote, anyone
remember why Lindows changed their name? :P )<br /><br />/Terje</p>