<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I don't understand. Are you saying that the problem here is that
since DK is not distributed as a signed/notarized package, DK will
not be able to work anymore on MacOS?</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>A few questions:</p>
<p>1: Why does it work when logging is enabled?</p>
<p>2: Is there no workaround to this?</p>
<p>3: Why did this work in previous versions of DK? Or is this just
a coincidence that my upgrading DK happens almost same time as I
updated MacOS - and update to MacOS is the real issue?</p>
<p>4: Regarding costs, have you reached out to Apple to apply for an
exemption? </p>
<p>5: What do other open source projects to do overcome this
obstacle?</p>
<p>6: Will this mean that from now on, DK will not be usable on
MacOS?</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p>BR</p>
<p>Thomas</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 02/04/2025 12.55, Gilles Caulier
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAHFG6sFxHqv+t1WJGwmrNL28+rS7NhcwhOjoKH7ejn8wLrhWzQ@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div>Welcome to the MacOS world with the regression introduced
by Apple with last MacOS version.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Look in this file from Bugzilla :</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453078"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453078</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>This one is nice too, as the digiKam PKG is not notarized
with the Apple workflow.</div>
<br>
<div><a href="https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496380"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496380</a></div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div> The cost is 100€ per year. It's a shame. I REFUSE to
give 1cts to Apple for an OpenSource project.</div>
<div>Apple must pay the developers to build applications for
MacOS (I'm Apple fan and user anyway).</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Best</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Gilles Caulier</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mer. 2 avr. 2025 à 10:43,
Thomas <<a href="mailto:sdktda@gmail.com"
moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext">sdktda@gmail.com</a>>
a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">So,
this is quite strange. And I had to check this several times
to make <br>
sure it was not me turning senile.<br>
<br>
When I enable logging, the problem is gone: DK opens images
from the <br>
collection just fine.<br>
<br>
However, if I start DK using the Dock icon, then it gives me
the error <br>
when opening an image.<br>
<br>
How can this be?<br>
<br>
<br>
I will send you the log separately.<br>
<br>
<br>
BR<br>
<br>
Thomas<br>
<br>
<br>
On 01/04/2025 20.44, Maik Qualmann wrote:<br>
> This UUID file can be used by all clients; we only had a
bug with a 8.x.x<br>
> version where we kept creating a new UUID. This UUID has
been used since<br>
> digiKam-8.x.x to reliably identify a collection. What
version did you upgrade<br>
> from to digiKam-8.6.0?<br>
> It's actually quite easy to get the collection back
online, but I would like<br>
> to see a log from the terminal when digiKam starts up to
identify the exact<br>
> problem. Please create the log:<br>
><br>
> <a href="https://www.digikam.org/contribute/#macos-host"
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true"
class="moz-txt-link-freetext">https://www.digikam.org/contribute/#macos-host</a><br>
><br>
> Maik<br>
><br>
> Am Dienstag, 1. April 2025, 20:35:10 Mitteleuropäische
Sommerzeit schrieb<br>
> Thomas:<br>
>> I still have the .dtrash folder.<br>
>><br>
>> It contains .dtrash/digikam.uuid as well as a lot of<br>
>> .dtrash/info/*-*.dtrashinfo files.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Please note that this collection is shared across
multiple client<br>
>> machines with DK on them. Several Macs, Linux and
Windows clients.<br>
>><br>
>> I was not aware there was some UUID in there. Is this
not supposed to be<br>
>> shared?<br>
>><br>
>> Is this perhaps related to the problems I have? I
have run this setup<br>
>> for like 15-20 years without problems....<br>
>><br>
>> On 01/04/2025 20.14, Maik Qualmann wrote:<br>
>>> Did you perhaps delete the hidden .dtrash folder
in the root of your<br>
>>> network folder? Is it still there and does it
contain a file named<br>
>>> "digikam.uuid"?<br>
>>><br>
>>> Maik<br>
>>><br>
>>> Am Dienstag, 1. April 2025, 19:41:03
Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb<br>
>>><br>
>>> Thomas:<br>
>>>> On 2025-04-01 18.57, Hans-Peter Huth wrote:<br>
>>>>> We need more info. Which Operating
system, if Linux, is it an official<br>
>>>>> Appimage, natively provided by the
distribution, flatpak, snap? I<br>
>>>>> suggest,<br>
>>>>> try the appimage.<br>
>>>> Good point!<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> OS is MacOS.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Hardware is MBP M3.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> DK is downloaded from the website. Installed
using the installer.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>