<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<p><font face="Book Antiqua">I don't trust automatic operations.<br>
If I choose to delete an old backup file, I will delete it
myself.<br>
Automatic device driver updaters? No. Not needed.<br>
Automatic Windows registry cleaners? Fat chance.<br>
Disk de-fragmenter? Nope. And what de-</font><font
face="Book Antiqua">fragmenting do</font><font
face="Book Antiqua"> SSD's need anyhow?</font></p>
<p><font face="Book Antiqua">DigiKam need not concern itself with
backup. I take care of that.</font></p>
<p><font face="Book Antiqua">Bob D</font></p>
<p><font face="Book Antiqua"><br>
</font></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 1/30/2025 11:06 AM, <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Gruhler@netic.de">Gruhler@netic.de</a>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:a5057d48-35b0-45fd-aff0-55b2622fabf1@netic.de">Report on
the keyword chaos:
<br>
Back to digikam 8.4 didn't fix the chaos, but did point out the
flaw in my backups (no database backup of versions prior to
digikam 8.5 installation available).
<br>
I will now set my backup to more versions that are not
overwritten.
<br>
<br>
Greetings
<br>
Paul
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Am 28.01.2025 um 16:31 schrieb Frédéric Da Vitoria:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">I understand you. Unfortunately, I don't
know the answer to your question. It is true that this dK
behaviour appeared recently, but I can't say at which version.
And I don't know if you can downgrade dK without causing
problems with the database.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>