<html><head><style>pre,code,address {
margin: 0px;
}
h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6 {
margin-top: 0.2em;
margin-bottom: 0.2em;
}
ol,ul {
margin-top: 0em;
margin-bottom: 0em;
}
blockquote {
margin-top: 0em;
margin-bottom: 0em;
}
</style></head><body><div>Thanks! With this you pointed me hierarchical list has an context menu. Holy Cow! I wasn't aware of this!</div><div><br></div><div>Kai</div><div><br></div><div>ti, 2024-03-05 kello 20:57 +0100, Maik Qualmann kirjoitti:</div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>I misunderstood that, you also have to select the children's albums from 2018 <br></div><div>with the right mouse button. It only searches albums marked [x], not <br></div><div>automatically recursively.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Maik<br></div><div><br></div><div>Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 20:50:45 CET schrieb <a href="mailto:kaizubg@gmail.com">kaizubg@gmail.com</a>:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Nope. I restart digiKam; start a new New Advanced Search and define<br></div><div>2018 in the selection list with this result:<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>It has nothing to do with the clear button.<br></div><div><br></div><div>The folder 2018 did not contain any photos. The photos reside in the<br></div><div>yyyy-mm-dd -folders.<br></div><div><br></div><div>In the next step I copy two photos in the 2018 folder and run the query<br></div><div>again. As a result the query functions as follows<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>So the selection 2018 in the list is interpeted in query engine as<br></div><div>search only in the folder 2018. <br></div><div><br></div><div>The only problem seems to be the user who thought that the search is<br></div><div>carried out recursively in all the folders. 😉<br></div><div><br></div><div> Kai <br></div><div><br></div><div>ti, 2024-03-05 kello 19:22 +0100, Maik Qualmann kirjoitti:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>We leave the clear button so that the layout doesn't jump. I haven't<br></div><div>really<br></div><div>liked it so far, let's see if we can add an invisible symbol so that<br></div><div>it's<br></div><div>easier to see that the field hasn't been reset yet.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Maik<br></div><div><br></div><div>Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 19:12:18 CET schrieben Sie:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Just deleting the album name doesn't work, you have to press the<br></div><div>reset<br></div><div>symbol at the end of the line. Otherwise they look for an empty<br></div><div>("")<br></div><div>string.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Maik<br></div><div><br></div><div>Am Dienstag, 5. März 2024, 17:01:25 CET schrieb <a href="mailto:kaizubg@gmail.com">kaizubg@gmail.com</a>:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Hi,<br></div><div><br></div><div>My photos are organized in an album using a<br></div><div>yyyy<br></div><div><br></div><div> yyyy-mm-dd<br></div><div> ...<br></div><div><br></div><div>- folder structure.<br></div><div><br></div><div>When I issue a advanced search using<br></div><div>Search items located in: Any Album<br></div><div>The album name contains: 2018<br></div><div>as a result I get the correct photos.<br></div><div><br></div><div>If I issue the query as<br></div><div>Search items located in: 2018<br></div><div>The album name contains:<br></div><div>as a ressult I get an error "The query from the database returned<br></div><div>no<br></div><div>results.....".<br></div><div><br></div><div>If I issue the query as<br></div><div>Search items located in: 2018-12-30<br></div><div>The album name contains:<br></div><div>as a result I get again the the correct photos.<br></div><div><br></div><div>Is this behaviour I'm observing (in ai versions 8.2 and 8.3) a<br></div><div>feature of<br></div><div>digiKam or possibly a bug? Kai<br></div><div><br></div><div>yi, 2024-03-05 kello 00:05 +0100, Benoît Barbier kirjoitti:<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>Your question comes just at the right moment, because there's<br></div><div>something<br></div><div>I didn't understand...<br></div><div><br></div><div>It seems that the collection created with the configuration<br></div><div>tool(Cf.<br></div><div>Collection.png) in "Collection", is an album in the search<br></div><div>tool(Cf.Album.png)...<br></div><div><br></div><div>--<br></div><div>Benoît<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>is an album in the search tool...<br></div><div><br></div><div>Le 4/03/24 à 21:57, Art Zemon a écrit :<br></div><blockquote type="cite" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex; border-left:2px #729fcf solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>While on vacation, I created a collection on a removable SSD<br></div><div>as a<br></div><div>backup. Is there a way to do an advanced search and exclude<br></div><div>the<br></div><div>photos in that collection? Or a way to do an advanced search<br></div><div>on<br></div><div>only<br></div><div>the photos of a single collection?<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- Art Z.<br></div><div><br></div><div>-- My blog: CheerfulCurmudgeon.com<br></div><div><<a href="https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/">https://CheerfulCurmudgeon.com/</a>><br></div><div>///In a place where there are no humans, strive to be human.<br></div><div>[Pirkei<br></div><div><br></div><div> Avot 2:5]/<br></div></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div><span></span></div></body></html>