<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="CA" link="blue" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">It was a long time ago since I checked, but the tag tree from Digikam was correctly seen by Lightroom and by ACDsee, which was good enough for me.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<div style="mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="border:none;padding:0cm"><b>De: </b><a href="mailto:planetorth@gmail.com">Peter Orth</a><br>
<b>Enviat: </b>dilluns, 31 d’octubre de 2022 12:12<br>
<b>Per a: </b><a href="mailto:davito9w@free.fr">Frédéric Da Vitoria</a><br>
<b>A/c: </b><a href="mailto:digikam-users@kde.org">digikam-users@kde.org</a><br>
<b>Tema: </b>Re: [digiKam-users] Keyword hierarchy</p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Frederic,<br>
Is this still the case?<br>
Years ago I decided against hierarchical keywords as they were very much not transferable between programs.
<br>
One of my priorities is keeping my filing system non-dependent on any particular software. This has helped as Iview/mediapro and Aperture have both gone away but my library persists!<br>
Is there a name for the implementation that DK uses for hierarchical keywords/tags, and any idea of what other software uses that same system?
<br>
<br>
---<br>
Peter Orth <br>
310 413 8267<br>
sent from the oPhone<br>
<br>
> On Oct 31, 2022, at 04:26, Frédéric Da Vitoria <davito9w@free.fr> wrote:<br>
> <br>
> there is no standard way to implement tags hierarchy. DigiKam's way of doing it is used by quite a few other software, but there are others which could be unable to understand it.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>