<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><div dir="auto">I think digikam cannot group faces that you have not previously identified. You have to first manually identify a few faces for each person and then run the face detection again.<div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">In the past I used Picasa for the first face recognition (has the feature you ask for), but beware that it does not detect existing keywords/faces, so these would be overwritten, potentially losing information.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jul 25, 2022 16:43, Tony Schwartz <InelUnit@outlook.com> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>
<p>Microsoft Photos does an ok job at grouping faces together that it perceives are the same. It just lacks the flexibility and other options DIGI has.<br>
<br>
Right now I am sorting through a 2 TB hard drive and having Digikam pull out all the faces. I bet at the end I will have over 2,000 photos. Out of that 900 will be ones I care about.<br>
<br>
Is there a way to ask digicam to sort the photos like Microsoft photo does? Or with Digi I must simply tag them?</p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>