<div dir="ltr">good one :)</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mar. 18 janv. 2022 à 11:19, Gilles Caulier <<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div>Hi,</div><div><br></div><div>Perhaps a solution is an updated FAQ based on best responses given on mailing list.</div><div><br></div><div>There is a FAQ page on digiKam.org but we (developers) don't have more free time to maintain.</div><div><br></div><div>Note : digiKam.org is gitlab based source code, and the page uses MarkerDown syntax. It can be easy for few users to maintain this page using a giltab fork and a merge request.</div><div><br></div><div>Just an idea...</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier<br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mar. 18 janv. 2022 à 11:15, frederic chaume <<a href="mailto:frederic.chaume@gmail.com" target="_blank">frederic.chaume@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
mailing list is fine for me, only missing from my point of view is
an efficient searching tool to retreive useful information , to get
knowledge from already answered questions. There is a link to access
all the mails, classified by month , but unusable for any search
capabilities (as far as I know)<br>
regards<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div>Le 18/01/2022 à 11:06,
<a href="mailto:irthomasthomas@gmail.com" target="_blank">irthomasthomas@gmail.com</a> a écrit :<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div dir="auto">I also like this mailing list format. I think the
empty forum simply reflects the digikam user demographics and
preferences. Perhaps the mailing list promotion and onboarding
can be improved instead?
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">Thanks to the team and everyone who contributes
here.</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, 18 Jan 2022, 09:59
Stuart T Rogers, <<a href="mailto:stuart@stella-maris.org.uk" target="_blank">stuart@stella-maris.org.uk</a>>
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I agree, I
like the mailing list and the fact that we get responses from
<br>
the developers on a regular basis. I also think that the
mailing list <br>
gets better requests for information than many forums because
people <br>
stop and think before posting a question because they know
everyone on <br>
the list will see their update.<br>
<br>
A forum has to be policed and that takes work which the
developers <br>
cannot spend time on, it is also far more open to abuse and
spam.<br>
<br>
Stuart<br>
<br>
On 18/01/2022 08:53, Andrew Goodbody wrote:<br>
> I am very much against using a forum. They are slower and
take more <br>
> effort to read.<br>
> <br>
> Andrew<br>
> <br>
> On 18/01/2022 08:13, Jack Marxer wrote:<br>
>> I want to thank the digiKam developers for all the
work they have done <br>
>> in developing and maintaining such a wonderful
program!<br>
>><br>
>> I also would like to use a forum, but I don't know if
there is someone <br>
>> who would be willing to develop and maintain it.<br>
>> Jack Marxer<br>
>><br>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:03 AM Ty Mayn <<a href="mailto:tyrus.mayn@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">tyrus.mayn@gmail.com</a> <br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:tyrus.mayn@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">tyrus.mayn@gmail.com</a>>>
wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> After study of the public viewable archives I
see that discussion<br>
>> is more immediate on this oldfashioned Mailman
listservice. Its<br>
>> clear to me that it is small but has some
responsive leaders with<br>
>> knowledge.<br>
>> Meanwhile the similarly named digikam Forum
hosted by kde is<br>
>> small and more inactive. After posting there this
January I resorted<br>
>> to answering my own posting just to be partially
useful<br>
>> <a href="https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256</a><br>
>> <<a href="https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://forum.kde.org/viewforum.php?f=256</a>><br>
>> The energy on this list service deserves
better tools.<br>
>> <a href="https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/</a><br>
>> <<a href="https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/digikam-users/</a>><br>
>> The archive has at least 17 years of useful
knowledge zipped into<br>
>> 204 separate months that no newcomer (or even old
user)will easily<br>
>> search.<br>
>> Has anyone ever prepared and circulated a
consolidated archive<br>
>> ready for global search?<br>
>> Every posting member has their participating
email exposed to<br>
>> weak masking that only replaces @ with "at"
while the forum tools<br>
>> at KDE have good authentication and member
shelter.<br>
>> Am I the only one to have spoken on this
issue? I would have to<br>
>> search the archives to know but I suppose each
current member has a<br>
>> view and every pattern has inertia. Please
accept this as a<br>
>> positive input on a good thing<br>
>> Ty Mayn<br>
>><br>
>><br>
> <br>
> <br>
<br>
-- <br>
Website: <a href="https://www.stella-maris.org.uk" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.stella-maris.org.uk</a><br>
or: https//<a href="http://www.broadstairs.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">www.broadstairs.org</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>
</blockquote></div>