<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><style id="css_styles">
blockquote.cite { margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc }
blockquote.cite2 {margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 0px; padding-left: 10px; padding-right:0px; border-left: 1px solid #cccccc; margin-top: 3px; padding-top: 0px; }
a img { border: 0px; }
li[style='text-align: center;'], li[style='text-align: center; '], li[style='text-align: right;'], li[style='text-align: right; '] { list-style-position: inside;}
body { font-family: Segoe UI; font-size: 12pt; }
.quote { margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em; border-left: 5px #ebebeb solid; padding-left: 0.3em; }
</style>
</head>
<body>Hello,<div><br></div><div>first of all many thanks to all people contributing to digikam. It is such a powerful open source tool!</div><div>I am running DK 7.2.0 on windows. My database is local and my photo collection is on a network drive. I ran the face detection for around one week. Unfortunately the windows machine lost the Ethernet/LAN connection during that time. This didn't stop the face detection and Digikam "succeeded" to scan all images. Now the database in the state that all images are marked as scanned but around halve of them the detection didn't take place, as the files were not accessible on the network drive. </div><div><br></div><div>I would like to avoid a full rescan of my collection and start at the point of "failure".</div><div><ol style="list-style-type: decimal;"><li>Is there a smart way to "clean" the database or to find out which files have been actually scanned? (GUI or directly in the database)<br>In which order does Digikam scans the photos?<br><br></li><li>If you agree that is a "bug": Do you think it makes sense to improve in an upcoming version and implement an error handling?</li></ol></div><div><br></div><div>Thank you for your help. </div><div>Cheers,</div><div>Thomas</div></body></html>