<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
Wow, that does work. When I turn on a "one star" filter or a "one
star" search and type Ctrl-0, the current photo disappears and the
next one is selected (as I would expect).<br>
<br>
Does that mean that it is a bug that when I have a "None, Pending,
or Accepted flags" filter or a "None of the conditions are met, with
Reject flag" search and type Alt-1 to reject a photo it doesn't
disappear from view?<br>
<br>
Can anyone confirm that they see the same behaviors (i.e. there
isn't something messed up in my environment)?<br>
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
PS: It looks like the same issue happens with colors. If I have
a"None color" filter and type Ctrl-Alt-1 to assign red to the
selected image, the image doesn't disappear from view. Why do star
ratings/filters work differently (better IMO) than the others?<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/9/2020 5:06 PM, mippo
mippo9-at-gmail.com |digikam-users| wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAGs6RF49wBt3YqKBa=BJjg8MaEeq68nPqAbqPdvdY-FQ+rtKCw@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">Hello,</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">I'm trying
this solution, muted from Darktable:</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">- when
importing for the first time I apply one star to all
(Modify, Select All, then Ctrl-1)</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"> Then
during the necessary review, I apply the following criteria:</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">- for to
reject ones, I apply zero star (Ctrl-0);</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">- for the
good enough, I leave the current (one) star;</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">- for the
better I apply two stars (ctrl-2);</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">then, for
viewing the preview, apply the "one star" filter, by
default.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">in order to
view the better, apply "two stars", and so on ...</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">Actually I
continue keeping all the rejected photos (that are about
60-80% of the total, because of "just in case", having no
problem of disk room.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">simply but
effective ...</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large">what do you
think about this?</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-size:large"><br>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno dom 9 ago 2020
alle ore 22:04 <<a
href="mailto:2895qgvg6v@liamekaens.com" target="_blank"
moz-do-not-send="true">2895qgvg6v@liamekaens.com</a>>
ha scritto:<br>
</div>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">I asked this a week ago,
but got no response, so I'm trying again ...<br>
<br>
The first thing I do, after importing my photos, assigning
high-level keywords and renaming them, is to make a pass
over all the photos to reject all the hopelessly bad ones.
In Lightroom I do this by setting the filter to "No Rejects"
(i.e. Unflagged or Flagged, but not Rejected), then
examining each photo to check that the subject(s) are in the
frame, check critical focus, etc., and typing X to reject
the photo if it fails any of the checks. If Lightroom is in
grid view when I reject a photo, the photo immediately
disappears from view and the next photo is selected. If
Lighroom is in loupe view when I reject a photo, again the
photo immediately disappears from view and is replaced by
the next photo. At a much later point in my image
processing workflow (after selecting the "best" photos,
processing them and exporting them for publishing), I delete
all the rejected photos.<br>
<br>
I have attempted to do the same thing in digiKam. I can
replicate "No Rejects" by selecting None, Pending, and
Accepted (but not Rejected) either in the Picture Properties
section of the Advanced Search dialog from the Search View
in Left Sidebar, or in the Filters tab in the Right
Sidebar. In both cases however, when I type Alt+1 to reject
a photo, the photo doesn't disappear from either the Icon
area (the thumbnails) or the Preview area. Instead I see
the reject flag on the Thumbnail (unless I'm in full screen
where the Icon area is hidden), and no indication in the
Preview area that the image was rejected. This means I have
to manually type Right-arrow to move to the next image,
doubling the number of key-strokes needed in this very
time-consuming part of my workflow. The rejected photos do
disappear if I switch to a different saved search and then
switch back to the "No Rejects" saved search, or if I make
some change to the Filter settings (e.g. selecting then
unselecting the "None" color label.<br>
<br>
I thought I remembered some discussion of this, but my
searches failed to find it.<br>
Is there some way to instantly hide photos from view when
they are rejected?<br>
<br>
I also found that while I can save my "No Rejects" search, I
don't see a way to save my "No Rejects" filter.<br>
Is there a way to save a Filter similar to saving a Search?<br>
<br>
I'm guessing (and hoping) that both are possible and I just
haven't found the place in the digiKam handbook that
describes how to do it.<br>
Thanks.<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>