<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif'>
<p>Thanks guys, for pointing me at <a href="https://download.kde.org/stable/digikam/6.4.0/">https://download.kde.org/stable/digikam/6.4.0/</a> ... it would be REALLY nice to have a link that always points at the last version ...</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p>Sincerely, Joh</p>
<p id="reply-intro">On 2020-04-21 16:10, Johannes Graumann wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">
<div id="replybody1">
<div style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Verdana,Geneva,sans-serif;">
<p>I found the appimage, which might be an alternative (earlier search for flatpak did not produce a result) - is there a source for an app image? I have the impression that what's found at <a href="https://files.kde.org/digikam/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://files.kde.org/digikam/</a> is to cutting edge for me ...</p>
<p>Sincerely, Joh</p>
<p id="v1reply-intro">On 2020-04-21 08:19, Johannes Graumann wrote:</p>
<blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0;">
<div class="v1pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace;">I'm moving my setup to QubesOS and they do not offer a template OS<br />image that offers a newer version of digikam. I could overcome this by<br />using a flatpak, but digikam does not seem to distribute that way ...<br /><br />But the bottom line is: it should be possible.<br /><br />Sincerely, Joh<br /><br />On Mon, 2020-04-20 at 22:01 +0100, <a href="mailto:digikam-users-request@kde.org" rel="noreferrer">digikam-users-request@kde.org</a> wrote:
<blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0;">Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 22:54:40 +0200<br /><br />From: Maik Qualmann <<a href="mailto:metzpinguin@gmail.com" rel="noreferrer">metzpinguin@gmail.com</a>><br /><br />To: digiKam - Home Manage your photographs as a professional with the<br /><br /> power of open source <<a href="mailto:digikam-users@kde.org" rel="noreferrer">digikam-users@kde.org</a>><br /><br />Subject: Re: [digiKam-users] Database backward compatibility? 6.4.0-9<br /><br /> --> 6.0.0-5<br /><br />Message-ID: <2759958.C4g2VmnSn1@linux-tpgn><br /><br />Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"<br /><br /><br /><br />Not a good idea. The core database schema has not changed between<br />6.0.0 and <br /><br />6.4.0. But there are a lot of bugs fixed between these versions.<br /><br /><br /><br />Maik<br /><br /><br /><br />Am Montag, 20. April 2020, 22:46:05 CEST schrieb Johannes Graumann:<br /><br />
<blockquote style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0;">Hi,<br />I'm in the process of moving my archive setup from archlinux<br />(currently<br />using digikam 6.4.0-9) to fedora-30 (@ digikam 6.0.0-5).<br />Could that work with respect to databse structure and data<br />retention?<br />Thank you for any insight.<br />Sincerely, Joh</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br /></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br /></p>
</body></html>