<div dir="ltr">If we remove the debug symbols in bundles, we will not able to identify the origin of a crash in the application. This si true for MacOS, Windows ans Linux.<div><br></div><div>The official Linux distribution trough RPM/DEB provide applications by 2 versions : with and without debug symbols. In prior, the no debug version is installed, and if necessary, the debug version is available to hack.</div><div><br></div><div>To reproduce this plan with bundle, this require to build 2 version of each bundles, with will be time, power, and space consuming...</div><div><br></div><div>Best</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le jeu. 7 nov. 2019 à 23:11, J Albrecht <<a href="mailto:heviiguy@gmail.com">heviiguy@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div style="overflow-wrap: break-word;"><div>Thanks for your comments, Giles.</div><div><br></div><div>Can it be suggested to whomever compiles the MacOS package that the full debug symbols should not be included?</div><div><br></div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 7 Nov 2019, at 14:19, Gilles Caulier <<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com" target="_blank">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr">Probably, the full debug symbols are present in all libraries from digiKam.<div><br></div><div>If digiKam is compiled with the minimum debug symbols, this will reduce a lots the size...</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le jeu. 7 nov. 2019 à 20:11, J Albrecht <<a href="mailto:heviiguy@gmail.com" target="_blank">heviiguy@gmail.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div>During installation of the package, the following dialogue comes up: “Standard Install on… This will take 914.6 MB of space on your computer”<div><br></div><div>Just for laughs, I also ran through the installation procedure for 7.0. It requires 1.2 GB!! </div><div><div><br></div>So, yeah, it is a MASSIVE program.<div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br><div><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 7 Nov 2019, at 11:04, Mica Semrick <<a href="mailto:mica@silentumbrella.com" target="_blank">mica@silentumbrella.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div>The macOS package is 296 mb, which is less than both the windows packages and the Linux appimage.<br><br>Not sure what you're seeing...<br><br>-m<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On November 7, 2019 7:36:12 AM PST, J Albrecht <<a href="mailto:heviiguy@gmail.com" target="_blank">heviiguy@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>Wow. The Mac OS package is now pushing the limits of 1GB! This makes it one of the largest software packages on my Box. If keeps evolving this way, there will be a time when I’m sure that I won’t be the only one who can no longer use the program.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div>
<div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div>On 6 Nov 2019, at 15:16, Gilles Caulier <<a href="mailto:caulier.gilles@gmail.com" target="_blank">caulier.gilles@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br><div><div dir="ltr">Official release files are here :<div><br></div><div><a href="https://download.kde.org/stable/digikam/6.4.0/" target="_blank">https://download.kde.org/stable/digikam/6.4.0/</a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Release announcement is under process, please wait...</div><div><br></div><div>Gilles Caulier</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Le mer. 6 nov. 2019 à 20:38, <<a href="mailto:digikam@911networks.com" target="_blank">digikam@911networks.com</a>> a écrit :<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Is the 6.4.0 appimage out?<br>
<br>
I see that 7.0-git is being worked on, but I do not see 6.4.0. I only<br>
see: digikam-6.4.0-git-20191027T165309-x86-64.appimage on<br>
<a href="http://files.kde.org/digikam/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">files.kde.org/digikam/</a><br>
<br>
or is digikam-6.4.0-git-20191027T165309-x86-64.appimage the official<br>
but it's named -git-...<br>
<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
-- <br>
sknahT<br>
<br>
vyS<br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div></blockquote></div>
</div></blockquote></div><br></div></blockquote></div>