<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp46e2812fyahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div></div>
<div>Hi <span>Maderios,</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>Thanks for your advice. <br></span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>I have tried XSane for more than one week scanning film negatives but the result was not good. VueScan works for me here and the images are very nice. I wonder whether there is an alternation in Open Source.</span></div><div><span><br></span></div><div><span>Regards</span></div><div><span>SL</span><br></div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="yahoo_quoted_8317111363" class="yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Friday, May 10, 2019, 8:26:15 PM GMT+8, <leoutation@gmx.fr> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div dir="ltr">On 5/10/19 1:38 PM, Stephen Liu wrote:<br clear="none">> Hi all,<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> DigiKam is complete new to me. I'm running it to scan film negatives on<br clear="none">> Epson flatbed scanner. The images scanned are not clear.<br clear="none">><br clear="none">> Please advise how to set the items on both "Basic Options" and "Scanner<br clear="none">> Specific Options". Pointers would be appreciated.<div class="yqt0585988762" id="yqtfd09173"><br clear="none">><br clear="none">Hi</div><br clear="none">To compare, you may try Xsane, the best sane frontend for me, or any<br clear="none">Sane frontend.<br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none"><br clear="none">--<br clear="none">Maderios</div></div>
</div>
</div></body></html>